Jigsaw pieces

28 12 2011

Regular readers will remember that I recently perused the online catalogue of Musée d’Orsay in Paris, and was entranced by the soul-searching gaze from Madame de Loynes. Also that she appeared to have cut herself shaving. But no matter. What’s passed is past.

There were many other paintings that also caught my eye, as you can well imagine. Several nudes for instance. All women I noticed. Odd that! Not that they caught my eye, but that there were not any male nudes. Sexism on the part of the artists? The commissioner of the paintings? Society at the time of their creation? The Musée’s collection buyers? The paying public? All of the above?

Several of the nude studies were titled with variations of “woman performing her morning toilette”. In other words having a face-wash and brushing her teeth (though the latter never seemed to be captured.) This then was the stock excuse for having a woman stand naked in your studio for a few weeks while you painted her. Or the canvas at least. Some, most even (these were in the Musée d’Orsay after all), were exquisitely executed as representations of the nude or semi-nude female form. But not what you’d necessarily call “erotic” or “sensuous”.

But then I saw this one…

Musée d'Orsay: Dora vue de dos

Musée d'Orsay: Dora vue de dos

Musée d’Orsay: Dora vue de dos

It’s by Georges-Victor Hugo and is called “Dora vue de dos”, or “back view of Dora”… so poetic! I think the Dora in question is  Dora Charlotte DORIAN… but it wouldn’t be the first time I was wrong.

But what a picture! The nape of a woman’s neck. Dora’s it would seem. No nudity beyond what has always been socially acceptable. Yet painted with grace and sensitivity. I love it. Way more sexy than those more explicit nudes. Kudos Monsieur Hugo, kudos!


Actions

Information

2 responses

29 12 2011
misfits' miscellany

An X of mine might try to draw (or paint) a parallel between the brush as penis and the canvas as the blank centre of a woman, necessarily mutable, trying to reinvent herself in the company of every new painter to survive the cruel vicissitudes of a phallogocentric hegemony. But she was such a poser and I a poor painter.

And I’m pretty sure that Vlad the Impaler adopted, for legal reasons, the pseudonym Georges-Victor Hugo.

29 12 2011
Quieter Elephant

I think that was Vlad the Impala you’re thinking of. He was always ‘loping around.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 136 other followers

%d bloggers like this: